| Type | Standard / Implementation Specification | Standards Process Maturity | Implementation Maturity | Adoption Level | Federally required | Cost | Test Tool Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standard
|
Final
|
Production
|
Yes
|
Free
|
N/A
|
||
|
Standard
|
Final
|
Production
|
Yes
|
Free
|
N/A
|
||
|
Standard
|
Final
|
Production
|
No
|
Free
|
N/A
|
||
|
Standard
|
Final
|
Production
|
No
|
$
|
No
|
||
|
Standard
|
Final
|
Production
|
No
|
Free
|
N/A
|
| Limitations, Dependencies, and Preconditions for Consideration | Applicable Value Set(s) and Starter Set(s) |
|---|---|
|
General considerations:
For Immunization Information System (IIS) consideration:
|
Comment
Submitted by kwboone on
This is clearly the right…
This is clearly the right value set for historical data, as that is the value set used.
Submitted by rmcclure on
Agree with the code system…
Agree with the code system and value set identified. The VSAC direct url for this value set is https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/valueset/2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.6/expansion.
I would like to also have the ISA include RxNorm as an additional code system to describe vaccines. That value set is Vaccine Clinical Drug 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.8 https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/valueset/2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.8/expansion
Submitted by Albert Taylor
on
added value of RxNorm
Given the uptake of CVX/MVX standards, what would the added value of RxNorm be in representing vaccines over CVX/MVX along?







Submitted by gdixon on
RxNorm and Immunizations?
These are the correct value sets to represent Historical immunizations.
RxNorm is included in list of value and starter sets. (RxNorm Vaccine Clinical Drug 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1010.8)
If CVX and MVX have it covered what is the use case for RxNorm?